I belong to one of the most diverse blogging groups in the class. There are people of four different nationalities and four different races in my group. However, it is amazing to see how smooth our discussions are. Everyone understands each other and contributes constructively. I am going to examine the reason for this in the light of a theory.
The Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT) suggests that people subconsciously change their speech style to the style of the listener in order to accommodate with him/her. I find CAT very relevant to our group. Everyone understands the need to come out of their comfort zone and speak in a manner which is easily understandable for others. We read the other person and react in a manner which we think would bring our point across clearer to the listener.
However, CAT fails to explain fully how communication in a team works. Whose style of speaking do we accommodate with when there are people from so many backgrounds in a group? From my observation of our group, I realise that we all try to standardise our communication by modifying our speaking pattern to one that is widely accepted and practiced in Singapore. To put it clearly, we talk in the ‘Singapore way’. This provides a common style of speaking for everyone, which is also understood by everyone.
CAT is just one of the many theories that exist on intercultural communication. There are also ‘Identity Management Theory’ and ‘Standpoint Theory’. All these theories explain how cross-cultural interaction can be effective. From my experience, each member in my group has shown good communication skills; our cultural differences have not been able to impede our discussions and we have had a productive time in our meetings.
Following are some links if you want to read up more about the theories:
http://highered.mcgraw-hill.com/sites/0767430344/student_view0/chapter29/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication_Accommodation_Theory